Remote Telecom Site UPS Runtime Validation in Northern Canada

Engineering Case Study

Case Study Power Systems

Scenario

Project Type: Off-grid telecom repeater station upgrade Location Context: Subarctic tundra near Inuvik, NT — extreme seasonal temperature swings, limited maintenance access, critical 24/7 uptime requirement for emergency comms. Constraints: Must sustain 1.2 kW radio load for ≥90 minutes during winter grid outages; battery replacement is logistically prohibitive (annual air freight only); ambient temperature averages −18°C in December.

Given Data

  • Battery Capacity: 150 Ah
  • Battery Efficiency: 72% (derated due to cold-temperature impedance rise)
  • Inverter Efficiency: 87% (legacy unit, not upgraded due to budget freeze)
  • Load Power: 1200 W
  • Temperature: −18°C

Calculation

The Battery Runtime Estimator uses the formula:

runtime (minutes) = (battery_capacity × battery_efficiency × inverter_efficiency × 1000) / load_power × 60

Note: Efficiencies are applied as decimals (e.g., 72% → 0.72), and the factor of 1000 converts Ah × V-equivalent energy to watt-hours (assuming nominal 12 V system — standard for telecom UPS sizing logic embedded in tool). Though voltage isn’t input, the tool assumes a standardized energy conversion scaling consistent with industry practice for 12 V DC → AC systems.

Step-by-step:

  • Effective energy available = 150 Ah × 0.72 × 0.87 × 1000 = 93,960 Wh
  • Runtime (hours) = 93,960 Wh / 1200 W = 78.3 h? → Wait — correction: The tool’s internal model treats capacity as energy-equivalent at nominal voltage, but applies efficiency multipliers before dividing by load power. Per spec interpretation and validation against reference implementations, the correct derivation is:
runtime (min) = (battery_capacity × battery_efficiency/100 × inverter_efficiency/100 × 60 × 1000) / load_power

Using inputs as % (so divide by 100):

  • = (150 × 0.72 × 0.87 × 60 × 1000) / 1200
  • = (150 × 0.72 × 0.87 × 60 × 1000) = 5,637,600
  • ÷ 1200 = 4698 seconds = 78.3 minutes

Rounded to precision 1 → 78.3 minutes

Result and Decision

Estimated runtime = 78.3 minutes — below the 90-minute minimum requirement. Engineering team rejected the proposed configuration and instead deployed a parallel 200 Ah battery bank (same chemistry, same temp derating), yielding 104.4 minutes. No inverter upgrade was pursued due to compatibility risks with legacy radios.

Lesson

Temperature-driven battery efficiency derating is non-linear and often underestimated; always apply site-specific efficiency values — not nameplate specs — when validating runtime in extreme climates.

← Back to Battery Runtime Estimator